RTCA DO-254 / EUROCAE ED-80, Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware is a document providing guidance for the development of airborne electronic hardware, published by RTCA, Incorporated and EUROCAE. The DO-254/ED-80 standard was formally recognized by the FAA in 2005 via AC 20-152 as a means of compliance for the design assurance of electronic hardware in airborne systems.[1] The guidance in this document is applicable, but not limited, to such electronic hardware items as
The document classifies electronic hardware items into simple or complex categories. An item is simple "if a comprehensive combination of deterministic tests and analyses appropriate to the design assurance level can ensure correct functional performance under all foreseeable operating conditions with no anomalous behavior." Conversely, a complex item is one that cannot have correct functional performance ensured by tests and analyses alone; so, assurance must be accomplished by additional means. The body of DO-254/ED-80 establishes objectives and activities for the systematic design assurance of complex electronic hardware, generally presumed to be complex custom micro-coded components, as listed above. However, simple electronic hardware is within the scope of DO-254/ED-80 and applicants propose and use the guidance in this standard to obtain certification approval of simple custom micro-coded components, especially devices that support higher level (A/B) aircraft functions.[1][3]
The DO-254/ED-80 standard is the counterpart to the well-established software standard RTCA DO-178C/EUROCAE ED-12C. With DO-254/ED-80, the certification authorities have indicated that avionics equipment contains both hardware and software, and each is critical to safe operation of aircraft. There are five levels of compliance, A through E, which depend on the effect a failure of the hardware will have on the operation of the aircraft. Level A is the most stringent, defined as "catastrophic" effect (e.g., loss of the aircraft), while a failure of Level E hardware will not affect the safety of the aircraft. Meeting Level A compliance for complex electronic hardware requires a much higher level of verification and validation than Level E compliance.
- PHAC – Plan for Hardware Aspects of Certification
- HDP – Hardware Development/Desing Plan
- HVVP – Hardware Validation and Verification Plan
- HPAP – Hardware Process Assurance Plan
- HCMP – Hardware Configuration Management Plan
- HRS – Hardware Requirements Standards
- HDS – Hardware Design Standards
- HVVS – Hardware Validation and Verification Standards
Requirements
Management
Safety-Critical projects require provable requirements management and traceability. Did you know AFuzion’s Compliance Templates and Checklists are integrated with the world’s fastest- growing requirements management tool, Jama? Automate YOUR requirements management, planning, processes, and review checklists via an integrated solution: AFuzion & Jama.
MicroComputer Data Processing (dba MCDP), Inc.
4898 Worthington Cir., Rockledge FL 32955
DBA © 2020 MCDP, Inc., Systems ITV&VQ Services - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2020 Micro-Computer Data Processing.,
'LIFE ' is the most critical of all Safety-Critical Systems.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people:
Black, White, Brown, Red, Yellow, and Mixed lives matter;
Native, Immigrant and Non-Immigrant, lives matter;
Male, Female and Gender Fluid, lives matter;
Challenged and Unchallenged, lives matter;
Young and Old, lives matter;
Your and My, life matter.
.. Black Lives Matter (BLM) ..
.... All Lives Matter (ALM) ....